PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXFP.L (Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF) and HDEM.L (Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Invesco tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXFP.L returned 10.75%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for HDEM.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXFP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HDEM.L.

Performance

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXFP.L achieves a 26.12% return, which is significantly higher than HDEM.L's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MXFP.L has outperformed HDEM.L with an annualized return of 10.75%, while HDEM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.

MXFP.L

1D
-1.62%
1M
6.48%
YTD
26.12%
6M
28.40%
1Y
54.01%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
10.75%

HDEM.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
8.36%
6M
6.78%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXFP.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF		26.12%24.86%8.78%2.95%-10.46%-1.96%14.06%12.84%-9.61%24.99%
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF		8.36%18.32%3.92%3.74%-6.39%15.10%-10.00%11.46%-1.01%16.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MXFP.L and HDEM.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2016

0.78

The correlation between MXFP.L and HDEM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MXFP.L
HDEM.L

Technology

36.9%
4.3%

Financial Services

19.5%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
7.6%

Industrials

7.5%
10.6%

Communication Services

6.9%
6.0%

Basic Materials

6.6%
5.8%

Energy

4.1%
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.9%

Healthcare

2.9%
1.6%

Utilities

2.1%
9.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
4.6%

Technology

MXFP.L
36.9%
HDEM.L
4.3%

Financial Services

MXFP.L
19.5%
HDEM.L
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MXFP.L
9.6%
HDEM.L
7.6%

Industrials

MXFP.L
7.5%
HDEM.L
10.6%

Communication Services

MXFP.L
6.9%
HDEM.L
6.0%

Basic Materials

MXFP.L
6.6%
HDEM.L
5.8%

Energy

MXFP.L
4.1%
HDEM.L
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

MXFP.L
3.0%
HDEM.L
6.9%

Healthcare

MXFP.L
2.9%
HDEM.L
1.6%

Utilities

MXFP.L
2.1%
HDEM.L
9.9%

Real Estate

MXFP.L
1.0%
HDEM.L
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF

Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF

Often compared with MXFP.L:
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.LMXFP.L vs. QEMMMXFP.L vs. EMIM.LMXFP.L vs. P500.DEMXFP.L vs. FEM.LMXFP.L vs. EMV.LMXFP.L vs. E127.L
Often compared with HDEM.L:
HDEM.L vs. EUHD.LHDEM.L vs. WTEI.DEHDEM.L vs. EUNY.DEHDEM.L vs. JEPG.LHDEM.L vs. SCHDHDEM.L vs. JGPI.DEHDEM.L vs. JEPQ

Return for Risk

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MXFP.L
MXFP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MXFP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
HDEM.L
HDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MXFP.LHDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.18
2.49

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.08
3.58

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.43

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

4.80

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.75

13.83

+3.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXFP.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXFP.L and HDEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MXFP.LHDEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

2.49

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.51

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.52

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.54

+0.07

Drawdowns

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXFP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum HDEM.L drawdown of -32.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFP.L and HDEM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MXFP.LHDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-32.18%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-5.28%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

-12.22%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.92%

-18.05%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.23%

-32.18%

+4.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-3.70%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-6.84%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.83%

+1.20%

Volatility

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that MXFP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MXFP.LHDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

2.93%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

7.52%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

10.18%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

13.51%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

15.82%

+2.17%

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXFP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HDEM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXFP.L vs. HDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

MXFP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF		4.86%5.17%5.62%6.08%8.93%5.96%4.31%5.23%5.37%6.81%2.78%
MXFP.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MXFP.L and HDEM.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXFP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXFP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HDEM.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXFP.L and 0.49% for HDEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXFP.L and HDEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer