MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L).
MXFP.L and EIMI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MXFP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Apr 26, 2010. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both MXFP.L and EIMI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MXFP.L or EIMI.L.
Correlation
The correlation between MXFP.L and EIMI.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MXFP.L:
1.03
EIMI.L:
0.84
MXFP.L:
1.51
EIMI.L:
1.26
MXFP.L:
1.19
EIMI.L:
1.15
MXFP.L:
0.74
EIMI.L:
0.56
MXFP.L:
4.05
EIMI.L:
2.47
MXFP.L:
3.30%
EIMI.L:
4.88%
MXFP.L:
13.00%
EIMI.L:
14.32%
MXFP.L:
-27.23%
EIMI.L:
-38.73%
MXFP.L:
-5.68%
EIMI.L:
-10.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXFP.L achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 5.39% return.
MXFP.L
5.79%
2.98%
8.49%
14.07%
3.77%
N/A
EIMI.L
5.39%
5.05%
3.51%
12.83%
4.16%
4.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXFP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MXFP.L
EIMI.L
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXFP.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXFP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFP.L and EIMI.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MXFP.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.