PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXFP.L vs. P500.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (P500.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXFP.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
5.95%24.86%8.78%2.95%-10.46%-1.96%14.06%12.84%-9.61%24.99%
P500.DE
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-4.46%10.34%26.78%20.24%-9.34%31.10%13.08%27.86%0.55%11.26%
Different Trading Currencies

MXFP.L is traded in GBp, while P500.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the P500.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXFP.L achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than P500.DE's -4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MXFP.L has underperformed P500.DE with an annualized return of 8.69%, while P500.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.67% annualized return.


MXFP.L

1D
3.30%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
5.95%
6M
10.44%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
8.69%

P500.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
-4.46%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
14.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXFP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than P500.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXFP.L
MXFP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MXFP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

P500.DE
P500.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
P500.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
P500.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
P500.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
P500.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
P500.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (P500.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXFP.LP500.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

0.91

+0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

1.32

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

1.18

+1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.22

4.98

+5.24

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXFP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the P500.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXFP.L and P500.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXFP.LP500.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

0.91

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.84

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.91

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.98

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between MXFP.L and P500.DE is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXFP.L nor P500.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXFP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, roughly equal to the maximum P500.DE drawdown of -26.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFP.L and P500.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MXFP.LP500.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-33.78%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

-13.42%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.92%

-23.34%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.23%

-33.78%

+6.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.29%

-6.78%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-3.89%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.22%

-0.16%

Volatility

MXFP.L vs. P500.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (P500.DE) at 3.35%. This indicates that MXFP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than P500.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MXFP.LP500.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

3.35%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

8.40%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

16.14%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

14.79%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

15.99%

+1.83%