MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L).
MXFP.L and FLXE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MXFP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Apr 26, 2010. FLXE.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Oct 17, 2017. Both MXFP.L and FLXE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXFP.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 5.95% | 24.86% | 8.78% | 2.95% | -10.46% | -1.96% | 14.06% | 12.84% | -9.61% | 1.78% |
FLXE.L Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 7.01% | 18.87% | 8.11% | 6.48% | -9.68% | 8.46% | -1.63% | 7.98% | -6.24% | 1.90% |
Different Trading Currencies
MXFP.L is traded in GBp, while FLXE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXFP.L achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than FLXE.L's 7.01% return.
MXFP.L
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 30.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
FLXE.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXFP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXE.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXFP.L
FLXE.L
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) and Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXFP.L | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.90 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 2.61 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.58 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.22 | 9.93 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXFP.L | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.90 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.52 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXFP.L and FLXE.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXFP.L nor FLXE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXFP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXE.L drawdown of -26.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFP.L and FLXE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXFP.L | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -26.37% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -10.11% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.92% | -16.31% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -6.17% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -6.06% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.63% | +0.43% |
Volatility
MXFP.L vs. FLXE.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (MXFP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) at 5.91%. This indicates that MXFP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXFP.L | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 5.91% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 10.16% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.61% | 13.37% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 12.95% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 15.45% | +2.37% |