FLXE.L vs. IS3N.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE).
FLXE.L and IS3N.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLXE.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Oct 17, 2017. IS3N.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both FLXE.L and IS3N.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLXE.L or IS3N.DE.
Key characteristics
| FLXE.L | IS3N.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.39% | 15.66% |
| 1Y Return | 14.28% | 24.00% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.64% | 2.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.73% | 5.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.32 | 1.63 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.92 | 2.28 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.38 | 1.26 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.25 | 8.54 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.50% | 2.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.87% | 13.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.37% | -35.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.04% | -2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXE.L and IS3N.DE is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FLXE.L vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLXE.L achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 15.66% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLXE.L vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLXE.L vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLXE.L vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXE.L nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FLXE.L vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXE.L drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXE.L and IS3N.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLXE.L vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) have volatilities of 4.02% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.