PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXEQX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEQX achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 9.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXEQX having a 11.79% annualized return and FBLEX not far ahead at 12.33%.


MXEQX

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.44%
YTD
11.52%
6M
10.50%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
18.29%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
11.79%

FBLEX

1D
-0.58%
1M
1.38%
YTD
9.57%
6M
8.52%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXEQX
Great-West Large Cap Value Fund
11.52%16.92%15.35%12.28%-5.50%26.96%2.91%26.54%-9.91%15.41%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
9.57%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MXEQX and FBLEX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.93

The correlation between MXEQX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXEQX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEQX
MXEQX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MXEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MXEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXEQXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

3.39

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

13.66

+0.04

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEQX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEQX drawdown since its inception was -66.85%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEQX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXEQXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.85%

-39.73%

-27.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-6.89%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-14.71%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.81%

-19.00%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.73%

-39.73%

+2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.34%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-3.81%

-9.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.71%

+0.12%

Volatility

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 3.42%. This indicates that MXEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXEQXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.42%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

8.23%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

10.83%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

14.80%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

17.37%

+0.09%

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEQX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXEQX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

MXEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than FBLEX's 10.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.14%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
MXEQX
Great-West Large Cap Value Fund
1.61%1.80%3.99%2.17%0.93%2.87%1.72%4.75%6.51%4.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MXEQX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MXEQX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FBLEX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEQX dropped -66.85% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

MXEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXEQX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer