PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXDPX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXDPX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MXDPX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 5.30%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.57% annualized return.


MXDPX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.03%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.39%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
5.30%

SIFAX

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
8.33%
6M
7.95%
1Y
12.84%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
3.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXDPX
Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund
5.01%10.02%6.17%10.19%-11.44%9.24%9.30%14.91%-5.19%8.25%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.33%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MXDPX and SIFAX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.29

The correlation between MXDPX and SIFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXDPX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXDPX
MXDPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MXDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MXDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXDPXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

5.29

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

16.74

-7.95

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXDPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXDPX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXDPXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.36

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.04

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.69

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.34

-0.19

Drawdowns

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXDPX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXDPX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXDPXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-23.62%

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-2.41%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.03%

-3.57%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-8.32%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.55%

-14.69%

-5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.61%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-8.55%

-5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.76%

+0.58%

Volatility

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) is 1.92%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) has a volatility of 2.16%. This indicates that MXDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXDPXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

2.16%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

4.70%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

5.41%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.05%

5.60%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.89%

5.22%

+3.67%

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXDPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXDPX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

MXDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than SIFAX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXDPX
Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund
5.02%5.27%4.86%5.29%6.69%6.84%2.38%7.36%7.84%2.90%0.00%0.00%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.20%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXDPX and SIFAX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIFAX has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to MXDPX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXDPX dropped -39.33% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

SIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXDPX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer