PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXDPX vs. MXEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) and Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXDPX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than MXEQX's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MXDPX has underperformed MXEQX with an annualized return of 5.30%, while MXEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.55% annualized return.


MXDPX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.03%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.39%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
5.30%

MXEQX

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.57%
YTD
10.47%
6M
12.50%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
19.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXDPX
Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund
5.01%10.02%6.17%10.19%-11.44%9.24%9.30%14.91%-5.19%8.25%
MXEQX
Great-West Large Cap Value Fund
10.47%16.92%15.35%12.28%-5.50%26.96%2.91%159.33%-9.91%15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MXDPX and MXEQX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 1999

0.80

The correlation between MXDPX and MXEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXDPX vs. MXEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXDPX
MXDPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MXDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MXDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MXEQX
MXEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MXEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MXEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) and Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXDPXMXEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.66

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

13.92

-5.14

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXDPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the MXEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXDPX and MXEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXDPXMXEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.47

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.71

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.30

-0.15

Drawdowns

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXDPX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum MXEQX drawdown of -66.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXDPX and MXEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXDPXMXEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-66.85%

+27.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-7.03%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.03%

-14.90%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-16.81%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.55%

-37.73%

+17.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.31%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-13.29%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.83%

-0.49%

Volatility

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) is 1.92%, while Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that MXDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXDPXMXEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

2.47%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

7.79%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

10.43%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.05%

14.96%

-5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.89%

37.72%

-28.83%

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXDPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MXEQX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXDPX vs. MXEQX - Dividend Comparison

MXDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than MXEQX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXDPX
Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund
5.02%5.27%4.86%5.29%6.69%6.84%2.38%7.36%7.84%2.90%
MXEQX
Great-West Large Cap Value Fund
1.63%1.80%3.99%2.17%0.93%2.87%1.72%2.89%6.51%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXDPX and MXEQX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXEQX has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to MXDPX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXDPX dropped -39.33% vs MXEQX's -66.85%.

MXEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXDPX and MXEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer