PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXCPX vs. MXFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund (MXFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXCPX achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than MXFLX's 5.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MXCPX has underperformed MXFLX with an annualized return of 3.98%, while MXFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.45% annualized return.


MXCPX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.26%
YTD
3.87%
6M
4.11%
1Y
9.28%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
3.16%
10Y*
3.98%

MXFLX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.43%
YTD
5.84%
6M
6.14%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
3.87%8.19%4.95%8.41%-10.33%6.35%8.07%11.40%-3.95%5.94%
MXFLX
Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund
5.84%11.57%7.09%11.99%-14.12%10.22%11.94%18.42%-6.57%11.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MXCPX and MXFLX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009

0.92

The correlation between MXCPX and MXFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXCPX vs. MXFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXCPX
MXCPX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MXCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MXCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MXFLX
MXFLX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund (MXFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXCPXMXFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.56

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

10.70

-0.58

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the MXFLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXCPX and MXFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXCPXMXFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.95

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.63

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.45

-0.36

Drawdowns

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXCPX drawdown since its inception was -35.02%, which is greater than MXFLX's maximum drawdown of -28.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXCPX and MXFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXCPXMXFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.02%

-28.46%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.88%

-5.59%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.57%

-8.29%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.81%

-23.50%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.81%

-23.50%

+5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-7.16%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.34%

-0.42%

Volatility

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) is 1.62%, while Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund (MXFLX) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that MXCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXCPXMXFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

2.05%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.70%

5.36%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57%

7.36%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.72%

10.03%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

10.34%

-3.82%

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXCPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MXFLX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXCPX vs. MXFLX - Dividend Comparison

MXCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than MXFLX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
3.33%3.45%4.53%4.17%5.70%5.20%2.46%5.62%5.53%2.70%
MXFLX
Great-West Lifetime 2025 Fund
3.74%3.95%4.67%4.22%7.28%8.85%4.06%7.19%7.82%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXCPX and MXFLX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXFLX has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to MXCPX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXCPX dropped -35.02% vs MXFLX's -28.46%.

MXCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXCPX and MXFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer