PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXCPX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXCPX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 8.57% return.


MXCPX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.75%
YTD
3.61%
6M
4.11%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
3.95%

FSRKX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.57%
6M
9.33%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
3.61%8.19%4.95%8.41%-10.33%6.35%8.07%2.58%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
8.57%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MXCPX and FSRKX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between MXCPX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXCPX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXCPX
MXCPX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MXCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXCPXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

3.67

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.00

5.19

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.74

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

8.94

-6.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.11

33.72

-23.60

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXCPX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXCPXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

3.67

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.93

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.93

-0.83

Drawdowns

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXCPX drawdown since its inception was -35.02%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXCPX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXCPXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.02%

-19.93%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.88%

-1.93%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.57%

-5.84%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.81%

-12.74%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.93%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-3.21%

-9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.51%

+0.41%

Volatility

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.31%. This indicates that MXCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXCPXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

1.31%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.70%

3.68%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.58%

4.72%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.72%

6.94%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

7.80%

-1.28%

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXCPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXCPX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

MXCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than FSRKX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.26%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
3.33%3.45%4.53%4.17%5.70%5.20%2.46%5.62%5.53%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXCPX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXCPX has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to FSRKX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXCPX dropped -35.02% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXCPX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer