MXBSX vs. MXBPX
MXBSX (Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund) and MXBPX (Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund) are both mutual funds - MXBSX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Great-West, while MXBPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Great-West. Over the past 10 years, MXBSX returned 10.74%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for MXBPX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MXBSX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for MXBPX.
Performance
MXBSX vs. MXBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than MXBPX's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBSX has outperformed MXBPX with an annualized return of 10.74%, while MXBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.91% annualized return.
MXBSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 23.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
MXBPX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 18.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
MXBSX vs. MXBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund | 10.86% | 17.70% | 11.16% | 17.79% | -16.61% | 16.82% | 13.96% | 26.31% | -10.30% | 20.41% |
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 8.98% | 13.78% | 9.00% | 13.96% | -13.04% | 14.39% | 11.44% | 20.91% | -8.67% | 13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBSX and MXBPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2016 | 0.97 |
The correlation between MXBSX and MXBPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXBSX vs. MXBPX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBSX
MXBPX
MXBSX vs. MXBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXBSX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.66 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.34 | 9.22 | +2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXBSX vs. MXBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum MXBPX drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and MXBPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBSX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -55.80% | +23.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -7.12% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.76% | -11.46% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.68% | -25.51% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.88% | -28.63% | -3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.12% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -20.94% | +15.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.05% | +0.08% |
Volatility
MXBSX vs. MXBPX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) at 3.40%. This indicates that MXBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXBSX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 3.40% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 7.65% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 11.47% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 13.49% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 13.72% | +2.68% |
MXBSX vs. MXBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MXBPX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXBSX vs. MXBPX - Dividend Comparison
MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than MXBPX's 5.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 5.44% | 5.92% | 6.18% | 5.45% | 9.89% | 9.76% | 8.52% | 11.28% | 12.07% | 4.47% |
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund | 4.75% | 5.27% | 7.38% | 5.63% | 10.66% | 11.14% | 6.57% | 9.46% | 8.18% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MXBSX and MXBPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MXBSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to MXBPX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBSX dropped -31.88% vs MXBPX's -55.80%.
MXBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXBSX and MXBPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer