PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBSX vs. FNSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than FNSHX's 4.40% return.


MXBSX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
9.28%
6M
8.31%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
10.58%

FNSHX

1D
0.26%
1M
0.04%
YTD
4.40%
6M
4.25%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
9.28%17.70%11.16%17.79%-16.61%16.82%13.96%26.31%-10.30%7.15%
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
4.40%10.35%4.40%8.26%-11.31%3.16%9.01%10.74%-1.86%0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBSX and FNSHX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.61

The correlation between MXBSX and FNSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBSX vs. FNSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXBSX
MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSHX
FNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXBSXFNSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.65

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

11.34

-1.34

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FNSHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBSX and FNSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than FNSHX's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and FNSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBSXFNSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-15.87%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-3.68%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-4.89%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-15.87%

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.68%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-3.02%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.86%

+1.28%

Volatility

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX) at 2.39%. This indicates that MXBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBSXFNSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

2.39%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

4.43%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

5.06%

+7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

5.44%

+10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

4.88%

+11.47%

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSHX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXBSX vs. FNSHX - Dividend Comparison

MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than FNSHX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
2.99%3.21%3.19%2.98%5.94%6.17%4.43%3.74%5.22%0.00%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
4.82%5.27%7.38%5.63%10.66%11.14%6.57%9.46%8.18%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXBSX and FNSHX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXBSX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FNSHX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBSX dropped -31.88% vs FNSHX's -15.87%.

FNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBSX and FNSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer