PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBSX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's 1,644,791.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBSX has underperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 10.58%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 173.61% annualized return.


MXBSX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
9.28%
6M
8.31%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
10.58%

FRAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1,591,079.25%
YTD
1,644,791.35%
6M
1,641,761.62%
1Y
1,721,561.50%
3Y*
2,590.99%
5Y*
609.20%
10Y*
173.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
9.28%17.70%11.16%17.79%-16.61%16.82%13.96%26.31%-10.30%20.41%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
1,644,791.35%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%10.28%-2.05%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBSX and FRAMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2016

0.63

The correlation between MXBSX and FRAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (10 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBSX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXBSX
MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXBSXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-548,103.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

76,384.43

-76,383.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

519,686.03

-519,683.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

2,170,108.28

-2,170,098.28

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBSX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBSXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-33.94%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-3.45%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-5.02%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-16.31%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

-16.31%

-15.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

0.00%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-3.82%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.82%

+1.32%

Volatility

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) is 4.63%, while Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) has a volatility of 967.34%. This indicates that MXBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBSXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

967.34%

-962.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

967.35%

-957.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

1,589,373.65%

-1,589,360.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

712,487.94%

-712,471.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

503,403.77%

-503,387.42%

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXBSX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than FRAMX's 102.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
102.97%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
4.82%5.27%7.38%5.63%10.66%11.14%6.57%9.46%8.18%3.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXBSX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRAMX has higher volatility (967.34%) compared to MXBSX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBSX dropped -31.88% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

MXBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBSX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer