MXBSX vs. FCQTX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXBSX (Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund) and FCQTX (American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, MXBSX returned 7.95%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for FCQTX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXBSX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FCQTX.

Performance

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXBSX having a 10.07% return and FCQTX slightly higher at 10.51%.

MXBSX

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 22.71%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

FCQTX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 6M: 11.12%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 19.59%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund	10.07%	17.70%	11.16%	17.79%	-16.61%	16.82%	48.30%
FCQTX American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund	10.51%	20.74%	15.64%	21.56%	-19.63%	17.34%	47.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBSX and FCQTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2020	0.86

The correlation between MXBSX and FCQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXBSX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXBSX

MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 47
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FCQTX

FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 54
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MXBSX	FCQTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.16	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.03	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.40	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.64	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.93	12.00	-1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBSX and FCQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MXBSX	FCQTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.16	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.68	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.12	-0.47

Drawdowns

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than FCQTX's maximum drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and FCQTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXBSX	FCQTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.88%	-27.34%	-4.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	-9.83%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.76%	-15.53%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.68%	-27.34%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.58%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.94%	-5.88%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	2.16%	-0.05%

Volatility

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) is 3.33%, while American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that MXBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXBSX	FCQTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.62%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	9.64%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	12.04%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.89%	14.72%	+1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.37%	15.05%	+1.32%

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MXBSX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FCQTX's 4.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCQTX American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund	4.22%	4.67%	2.80%	1.99%	3.96%	1.54%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund	4.79%	5.27%	7.38%	5.63%	10.66%	11.14%	6.57%	9.46%	8.18%	3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXBSX and FCQTX in my portfolio?

MXBSX and FCQTX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MXBSX or FCQTX?

FCQTX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to MXBSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBSX dropped -31.88% vs FCQTX's -27.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.