MXBPX vs. TSAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX).
MXBPX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Sep 15, 1999. TSAIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011.
Performance
MXBPX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXBPX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | -2.14% | 13.78% | 9.00% | 13.96% | -13.04% | 14.39% | 11.44% | 20.91% | -8.67% | 13.52% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | -5.91% | 20.04% | 15.46% | 22.72% | -19.57% | 17.10% | 19.69% | 27.97% | -11.27% | 22.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBPX achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly higher than TSAIX's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBPX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 6.71%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.
MXBPX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 10.39%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
TSAIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXBPX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBPX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXBPX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBPX
TSAIX
MXBPX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXBPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.92 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.08 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 4.80 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXBPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.92 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.60 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.65 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBPX and TSAIX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXBPX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison
MXBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, less than TSAIX's 7.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 6.05% | 5.92% | 6.18% | 5.45% | 9.89% | 9.76% | 8.52% | 11.28% | 12.07% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 7.84% | 7.38% | 2.94% | 1.81% | 9.27% | 11.82% | 5.59% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 1.13% | 4.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
MXBPX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBPX drawdown since its inception was -55.80%, which is greater than TSAIX's maximum drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBPX and TSAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.80% | -34.58% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -11.72% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.51% | -28.28% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.63% | -34.58% | +5.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.12% | -10.28% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.11% | -4.96% | -16.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.77% | -0.45% |
Volatility
MXBPX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) is 3.62%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that MXBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXBPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 5.29% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 9.81% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 17.09% | -3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 16.15% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 17.59% | -3.94% |