MXAYX vs. JLKYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MXAYX (Great-West Lifetime 2030 Fund) and JLKYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, MXAYX returned 8.01%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for JLKYX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXAYX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JLKYX.

Performance

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2030 Fund (MXAYX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXAYX achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MXAYX has underperformed JLKYX with an annualized return of 8.01%, while JLKYX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.

MXAYX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 7.03%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 12.20%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

JLKYX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 29.09%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MXAYX Great-West Lifetime 2030 Fund	7.03%	13.30%	8.22%	13.71%	-14.31%	12.17%	12.76%	21.21%	-7.29%	15.67%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	12.94%	20.04%	15.41%	18.53%	-18.04%	18.38%	16.13%	25.07%	-8.32%	17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MXAYX and JLKYX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016	0.82

The correlation between MXAYX and JLKYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (10 years) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MXAYX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXAYX

MXAYX Risk / Return Rank: 51
MXAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MXAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MXAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MXAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MXAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

JLKYX

JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 69
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2030 Fund (MXAYX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MXAYX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.46	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	3.38	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.24	-0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	14.36	-2.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXAYX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MXAYX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.46	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.67	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.72	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.65	+0.04

Drawdowns

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXAYX drawdown since its inception was -24.86%, smaller than the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAYX and JLKYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXAYX	JLKYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.86%	-32.55%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	-9.16%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.57%	-16.11%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	-25.75%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.86%	-32.55%	+7.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-4.66%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	2.06%	-0.59%

Volatility

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2030 Fund (MXAYX) is 2.44%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that MXAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXAYX	JLKYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	3.55%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.16%	9.59%	-3.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.22%	12.05%	-3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.54%	15.21%	-3.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.86%	16.21%	-4.35%

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXAYX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MXAYX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

MXAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than JLKYX's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	3.19%	3.61%	1.77%	2.16%	8.08%	5.71%	3.88%	8.54%	10.69%	4.33%	3.23%	1.75%
MXAYX Great-West Lifetime 2030 Fund	4.29%	4.60%	5.85%	5.73%	9.66%	9.40%	5.78%	8.28%	7.37%	3.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXAYX and JLKYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MXAYX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MXAYX or JLKYX?

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to MXAYX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAYX dropped -24.86% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.