MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L
MWRL.L (Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating) and WMVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - MWRL.L tracks the MSCI World while WMVG.L tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. MWRL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WMVG.L.
Performance
MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MWRL.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMVG.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWRL.L
WMVG.L
MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWRL.L | WMVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.56 | — |
Drawdowns
MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWRL.L | WMVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.89% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.11% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWRL.L | WMVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.30% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 9.99% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.15% | — |
MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WMVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWRL.L vs. WMVG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MWRL.L nor WMVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MWRL.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.
MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.35% for WMVG.L.
Find the right allocation for MWRL.L and WMVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer