MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L
MWRL.L (Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating) and IWVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - MWRL.L tracks the MSCI World while IWVG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. MWRL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IWVG.L.
Performance
MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MWRL.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWVG.L
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 32.13%
- 6M
- 34.68%
- 1Y
- 64.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.11%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWRL.L
IWVG.L
MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWRL.L | IWVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.75 | — |
Drawdowns
MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWRL.L | IWVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.14% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.31% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWRL.L | IWVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.38% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.13% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.59% | — |
MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWRL.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison
MWRL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.88% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 3.22% | 3.11% | 2.61% | 2.37% | 2.90% | 2.48% |
MWRL.L Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MWRL.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.
MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.
Find the right allocation for MWRL.L and IWVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer