PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWIGX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWIGX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.18% return.


MWIGX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.32%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*

AMFIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.32%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
3.27%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
-0.05%7.99%3.82%6.55%-13.01%-1.13%8.41%11.21%4.27%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.18%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MWIGX and AMFIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.76

The correlation between MWIGX and AMFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWIGX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWIGX
MWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MWIGXAMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.97

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

9.10

-3.07

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWIGX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.32%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWIGX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWIGXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-9.35%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-0.74%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-0.88%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-8.91%

-9.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.52%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-2.01%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.24%

+0.51%

Volatility

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.46%. This indicates that MWIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWIGXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.46%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

0.92%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25%

1.12%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

2.17%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

1.74%

+3.02%

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWIGX has a 1.87% expense ratio, which is higher than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MWIGX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

MWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.22%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.07%3.70%4.52%4.97%6.33%4.25%9.21%12.03%3.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWIGX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWIGX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to AMFIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWIGX dropped -18.32% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWIGX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer