MWESX vs. AMFIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MetWest ESG Securitized Fund (MWESX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX).

MWESX is managed by Metropolitan West Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 2021. AMFIX is managed by AAMA. It was launched on Jun 30, 2017.

Performance

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MetWest ESG Securitized Fund (MWESX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MWESX MetWest ESG Securitized Fund	-0.10%	8.16%	8.45%	5.41%	-14.50%	-0.35%
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund	0.21%	3.74%	3.48%	3.84%	-6.26%	-0.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWESX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.21% return.

MWESX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 4.64%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMFIX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 2.97%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWESX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.

AMFIX

AAMA Income Fund

MWESX

MetWest ESG Securitized Fund

Return for Risk

MWESX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWESX

MWESX Risk / Return Rank: 64
MWESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MWESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MWESX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MWESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MWESX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

AMFIX

AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetWest ESG Securitized Fund (MWESX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MWESX	AMFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	3.05	-1.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	4.95	-3.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.69	-0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	4.18	-2.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.39	21.12	-15.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWESX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWESX and AMFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MWESX	AMFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	3.05	-1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.56	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between MWESX and AMFIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

MWESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MWESX MetWest ESG Securitized Fund	3.96%	4.55%	7.39%	3.63%	2.07%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund	2.22%	2.08%	2.44%	1.70%	0.83%	0.57%	0.83%	1.24%	1.24%	0.40%

Drawdowns

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWESX drawdown since its inception was -19.57%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWESX and AMFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MWESX	AMFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.57%	-9.35%	-10.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.08%	-0.74%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-0.49%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.08%	-2.06%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	0.15%	+0.94%

Volatility

MWESX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

MetWest ESG Securitized Fund (MWESX) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that MWESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MWESX	AMFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	0.48%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.54%	0.72%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42%	0.98%	+3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.89%	2.16%	+4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.89%	1.75%	+5.14%