MVLL vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MVLL is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, MVLL returned 797.95% vs 19.31% for QTJL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

MVLL vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVLL achieves a 776.39% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.42% return.

MVLL

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 102.27%
• YTD: 776.39%
• 6M: 776.25%
• 1Y: 797.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 7.21%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 19.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVLL vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	776.39%	-8.44%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.42%	24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MVLL and QTJL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.52

The correlation between MVLL and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

MVLL vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVLL	QTJL
Technology	66.6%	58.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

MVLL vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 94
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 67
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVLL vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVLL	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.60	1.96	+3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	2.80	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.40	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	16.47	2.90	+13.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.38	15.29	+18.10

MVLL vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVLL Sharpe Ratio is 5.60, which is higher than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVLL and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVLL vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVLL drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVLL and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVLL	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-33.40%	-25.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.93%	-6.68%	-42.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.10%	0.00%	-15.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.37%	-7.86%	-14.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.09%	1.27%	+22.82%

Volatility

MVLL vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a higher volatility of 83.43% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.60%. This indicates that MVLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVLL	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	83.43%	0.60%	+82.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	111.00%	7.46%	+103.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	144.07%	9.90%	+134.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.42%	20.32%	+126.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.42%	20.32%	+126.10%

MVLL vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVLL vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVLL nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVLL and QTJL in my portfolio?

MVLL and QTJL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVLL or QTJL?

MVLL has higher volatility (83.43%) compared to QTJL (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVLL dropped -59.02% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, MVLL or QTJL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 797.95% vs 19.31% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVLL or QTJL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 797.95% return vs 19.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVLL or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVLL or QTJL?

MVLL and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MVLL and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MVLL and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.60 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.