MVLL vs. ARMG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MVLL is passively managed, while ARMG is actively managed. Over the past year, MVLL returned 337.52% vs 123.28% for ARMG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.

Performance

MVLL vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVLL achieves a 307.91% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 374.91% return.

MVLL

• 1D: -15.28%
• 1M: -45.44%
• 6M: 332.17%
• YTD: 307.91%
• 1Y: 337.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMG

• 1D: -15.27%
• 1M: -43.03%
• 6M: 363.53%
• YTD: 374.91%
• 1Y: 123.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVLL vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	307.91%	-8.44%
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	374.91%	-40.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MVLL and ARMG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.60

The correlation between MVLL and ARMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MVLL vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 85
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 41
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVLL vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVLL	ARMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	0.86	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.09	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.26	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.62	1.82	+3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.17	3.11	+10.06

MVLL vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVLL Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVLL and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVLL vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVLL drawdown since its inception was -60.49%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVLL and ARMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVLL	ARMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.49%	-80.28%	+19.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.49%	-68.13%	+7.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.49%	-56.68%	-3.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.20%	-51.58%	+28.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.77%	39.80%	-14.03%

Volatility

MVLL vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a higher volatility of 63.47% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) at 59.73%. This indicates that MVLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVLL	ARMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	63.47%	59.73%	+3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	121.00%	122.78%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	149.98%	144.88%	+5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.06%	144.35%	+4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.06%	144.35%	+4.71%

MVLL vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVLL vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	1.02%	4.86%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVLL and ARMG in my portfolio?

MVLL and ARMG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVLL or ARMG?

MVLL has higher volatility (63.47%) compared to ARMG (59.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVLL dropped -60.49% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

Which ETF is better, MVLL or ARMG?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 337.52% vs 123.28% for ARMG. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARMG has been the lower-risk option at 59.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVLL or ARMG?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 337.52% return vs 123.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVLL or ARMG?

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVLL or ARMG?

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

What is the main difference between MVLL and ARMG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MVLL and 0.75% for ARMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.