MVIAX vs. MGAFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MVIAX (Praxis Value Index Fund) and MGAFX (Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - MVIAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds, while MGAFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MVIAX returned 12.38%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for MGAFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVIAX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for MGAFX.

Performance

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX) and Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVIAX achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than MGAFX's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MVIAX has outperformed MGAFX with an annualized return of 12.38%, while MGAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.

MVIAX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 25.84%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: 11.68%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

MGAFX

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 24.21%
• 3Y*: 15.10%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MVIAX Praxis Value Index Fund	14.12%	12.97%	10.24%	20.04%	-7.89%	24.54%	3.56%	34.46%	-8.53%	16.32%
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio	11.34%	15.50%	11.51%	16.96%	-17.05%	24.51%	14.09%	24.08%	-6.55%	16.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MVIAX and MGAFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010	0.91

The correlation between MVIAX and MGAFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MVIAX vs. MGAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVIAX

MVIAX Risk / Return Rank: 85
MVIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MVIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MVIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MVIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
MVIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

MGAFX

MGAFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
MGAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MGAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MGAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MGAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
MGAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX) and Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVIAX	MGAFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.20	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	3.09	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.41	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.16	3.05	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.83	12.96	+2.86

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the MGAFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVIAX and MGAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVIAX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than MGAFX's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVIAX and MGAFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVIAX	MGAFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.34%	-28.63%	-36.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-7.86%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-13.84%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.89%	-23.82%	+4.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	-28.63%	-7.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.09%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.08%	-3.97%	-8.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	1.85%	-0.20%

Volatility

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX) is 3.25%, while Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that MVIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVIAX	MGAFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	4.48%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	8.98%	-1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.24%	10.91%	-0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	13.64%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	14.17%	+2.65%

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVIAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than MGAFX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVIAX vs. MGAFX - Dividend Comparison

MVIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than MGAFX's 4.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio	4.01%	4.45%	3.36%	2.29%	3.02%	10.83%	4.87%	4.42%	6.15%	4.19%	3.50%	4.01%
MVIAX Praxis Value Index Fund	0.93%	1.06%	9.59%	4.63%	5.11%	3.63%	8.55%	4.84%	7.28%	6.40%	2.63%	5.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVIAX and MGAFX in my portfolio?

MVIAX and MGAFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVIAX or MGAFX?

MGAFX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to MVIAX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVIAX dropped -65.34% vs MGAFX's -28.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.