PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVFG vs. DIVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVFG vs. DIVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVFG achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than DIVD's 15.32% return.


MVFG

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.33%
6M
3.91%
YTD
12.63%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVD

1D
-0.21%
1M
3.03%
6M
11.04%
YTD
15.32%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVFG vs. DIVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVFG
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF
12.63%20.98%5.38%
DIVD
Altrius Global Dividend ETF
15.32%26.18%0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MVFG and DIVD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.62

The correlation between MVFG and DIVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVFG vs. DIVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVFG
MVFG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MVFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVFG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MVFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVFG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVD
DIVD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DIVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVFG vs. DIVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVFGDIVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.82

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.69

14.03

-7.34

MVFG vs. DIVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the DIVD Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVFG and DIVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVFG vs. DIVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVFG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, which is greater than DIVD's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFG and DIVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVFGDIVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-13.88%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-6.70%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.21%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-2.18%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

1.82%

+2.04%

Volatility

MVFG vs. DIVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) is 3.06%, while Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that MVFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVFGDIVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.28%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

8.42%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

11.34%

+7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

13.20%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

13.20%

+2.09%

MVFG vs. DIVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVFG has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVD's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVFG vs. DIVD - Dividend Comparison

MVFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than DIVD's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DIVD
Altrius Global Dividend ETF
2.69%2.86%3.39%2.96%0.60%
MVFG
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF
1.53%1.90%1.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVFG and DIVD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVD has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to MVFG (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFG dropped -15.34% vs DIVD's -13.88%.

On 1-year performance, MVFG leads with 25.81% vs 25.49% for DIVD. On fees, DIVD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MVFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MVFG has performed better with a 25.81% return vs 25.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for MVFG.

DIVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.53% for MVFG.

They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Altrius. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for MVFG and 0.49% for DIVD.

DIVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVFG and DIVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer