MVFD vs. MAMB

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MVFD (Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF) and MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVFD is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index, while MAMB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVFD returned 17.53% vs 7.38% for MAMB. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVFD charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for MAMB.

Performance

MVFD vs. MAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVFD achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than MAMB's 1.78% return.

MVFD

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -2.88%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAMB

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 1.07%
• 1Y: 7.38%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: 0.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVFD vs. MAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MVFD Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF	6.33%	10.09%	5.47%
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	1.78%	10.69%	1.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MVFD and MAMB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.20

Return for Risk

MVFD vs. MAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVFD

MVFD Risk / Return Rank: 38
MVFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MVFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MVFD Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MVFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MVFD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

MAMB

MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 41
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVFD vs. MAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVFD	MAMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.30	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.82	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.08	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	5.52	+0.09

MVFD vs. MAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the MAMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVFD and MAMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVFD vs. MAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVFD drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, roughly equal to the maximum MAMB drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFD and MAMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVFD	MAMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-19.33%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.08%	-3.55%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.72%	-1.87%	-2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-7.44%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	1.34%	+1.79%

Volatility

MVFD vs. MAMB - Volatility Comparison

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) at 1.71%. This indicates that MVFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVFD	MAMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	1.71%	+2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.39%	4.42%	+5.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	5.72%	+9.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	7.02%	+9.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	6.91%	+10.08%

MVFD vs. MAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVFD has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MAMB's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVFD vs. MAMB - Dividend Comparison

MVFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than MAMB's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.44%	2.47%	2.11%	1.73%	0.92%	0.56%
MVFD Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF	1.48%	1.34%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVFD and MAMB in my portfolio?

MVFD and MAMB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVFD or MAMB?

MVFD has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to MAMB (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFD dropped -19.07% vs MAMB's -19.33%.

Which ETF is better, MVFD or MAMB?

On 1-year performance, MVFD leads with 17.53% vs 7.38% for MAMB. On fees, MVFD is cheaper at 1.19% per year. On volatility, MAMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVFD or MAMB?

Over the 1-year period, MVFD has performed better with a 17.53% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVFD or MAMB?

MVFD is cheaper with a 1.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for MAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVFD or MAMB?

MAMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.48% for MVFD.

What is the main difference between MVFD and MAMB?

MVFD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while MAMB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. MVFD tracks Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index, while MAMB tracks Monarch Ambassador Income Index. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for MVFD and 1.49% for MAMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.