MVEU.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MVEU.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - MVEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVEU.L returned 6.63%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for CMU.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVEU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MVEU.L is traded in EUR, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEU.L achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 16.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MVEU.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 6.63%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.55% annualized return.

MVEU.L

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 7.60%
• 1Y: 5.80%
• 3Y*: 10.44%
• 5Y*: 7.49%
• 10Y*: 6.63%

CMU.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: 16.24%
• 6M: 17.51%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 15.69%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: 9.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MVEU.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	6.31%	11.66%	11.79%	10.66%	-12.67%	21.67%	-3.86%	22.42%	-3.82%	9.48%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	16.24%	19.15%	6.31%	16.82%	-10.18%	20.38%	-1.09%	26.62%	-12.65%	12.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MVEU.L and CMU.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012	0.76

The correlation between MVEU.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVEU.L	CMU.L
Financial Services	17.6%	21.8%
Industrials	14.8%	15.7%
Consumer Defensive	13.1%	5.2%
Healthcare	12.8%	4.2%
Utilities	10.2%	5.8%
Communication Services	9.6%	2.3%
Energy	7.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	5.5%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.8%	10.1%
Technology	2.8%	30.8%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.3%

Return for Risk

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVEU.L

MVEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MVEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
MVEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MVEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MVEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MVEU.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	1.68	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.45	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.31	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	2.38	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.15	8.94	-6.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEU.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MVEU.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	1.68	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.64	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.56	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.45	+0.20

Drawdowns

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEU.L drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -38.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEU.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVEU.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.56%	-38.75%	+8.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-10.61%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.78%	-14.04%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.51%	-23.95%	+4.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.56%	-38.75%	+8.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-0.94%	-1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-6.80%	+2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.83%	-0.26%

Volatility

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) is 2.52%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that MVEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVEU.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	4.94%	-2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.90%	12.37%	-5.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.59%	15.08%	-6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.06%	16.06%	-5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.49%	17.15%	-4.66%

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MVEU.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVEU.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVEU.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

MVEU.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MVEU.L or CMU.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVEU.L or CMU.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVEU.L.

What is the main difference between MVEU.L and CMU.L?

MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MVEU.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.