PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVEA.L is traded in GBP, while BCOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCOG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEA.L achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than BCOG.L's 24.98% return.


MVEA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
3.05%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.61%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

BCOG.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
24.98%
6M
23.49%
1Y
38.11%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVEA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF
1.73%-2.72%14.94%6.35%-1.55%26.04%0.75%
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
24.98%8.16%6.13%-12.32%29.36%29.04%7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MVEA.L and BCOG.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020

0.16

The correlation between MVEA.L and BCOG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVEA.L
BCOG.L

Technology

30.2%
5.6%

Healthcare

15.0%

-

Financial Services

12.7%
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
12.9%

Communication Services

6.2%
12.3%

Industrials

5.7%

-

Utilities

4.7%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%
35.8%

Real Estate

3.1%
5.8%

Technology

MVEA.L
30.2%
BCOG.L
5.6%

Healthcare

MVEA.L
15.0%
BCOG.L

-

Financial Services

MVEA.L
12.7%
BCOG.L
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

MVEA.L
9.3%
BCOG.L
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MVEA.L
6.6%
BCOG.L
12.9%

Communication Services

MVEA.L
6.2%
BCOG.L
12.3%

Industrials

MVEA.L
5.7%
BCOG.L

-

Utilities

MVEA.L
4.7%
BCOG.L

-

Energy

MVEA.L
3.4%
BCOG.L

-

Basic Materials

MVEA.L
3.2%
BCOG.L
35.8%

Real Estate

MVEA.L
3.1%
BCOG.L
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVEA.L
MVEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOG.L
BCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVEA.LBCOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.37

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

4.43

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

10.23

-8.59

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEA.L and BCOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVEA.LBCOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

2.05

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.74

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.49

+0.12

Drawdowns

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum BCOG.L drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEA.L and BCOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVEA.LBCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-28.15%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-8.57%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.36%

-14.48%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.36%

-27.76%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-5.16%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-11.67%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

3.72%

-1.53%

Volatility

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) is 2.87%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that MVEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVEA.LBCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

6.06%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

15.89%

-9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.60%

18.51%

-9.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

16.89%

-5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.94%

15.71%

-3.77%

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVEA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MVEA.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVEA.L nor BCOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MVEA.L and BCOG.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCOG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCOG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MVEA.L.

MVEA.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BCOG.L is Commodities. MVEA.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while BCOG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVEA.L and 0.15% for BCOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVEA.L and BCOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer