PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNKX vs. FMPOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNKX achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than FMPOX's 22.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FRNKX has underperformed FMPOX with an annualized return of 7.92%, while FMPOX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.


FRNKX

1D
0.85%
1M
3.67%
YTD
11.52%
6M
10.62%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
7.92%

FMPOX

1D
1.40%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.56%
6M
21.00%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
11.52%12.05%19.31%14.88%4.23%6.46%12.84%4.15%-2.24%-2.81%
FMPOX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
22.56%13.02%14.48%22.51%-10.62%33.96%0.95%23.61%-18.93%17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNKX and FMPOX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.78

The correlation between FRNKX and FMPOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNKX vs. FMPOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNKX
FRNKX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FRNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FMPOX
FMPOX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FMPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRNKXFMPOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

4.01

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

15.40

-8.55

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FMPOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNKX and FMPOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNKX drawdown since its inception was -97.09%, which is greater than FMPOX's maximum drawdown of -61.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNKX and FMPOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNKXFMPOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.09%

-61.76%

-35.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-10.29%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.09%

-23.74%

-73.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.09%

-23.74%

-73.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.09%

-45.11%

-51.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.82%

-0.24%

-95.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-9.04%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.68%

+0.03%

Volatility

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) is 3.48%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that FRNKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNKXFMPOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

5.43%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

12.52%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

16.66%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,805.05%

20.26%

+1,784.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,276.09%

21.17%

+1,254.92%

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNKX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FMPOX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRNKX vs. FMPOX - Dividend Comparison

FRNKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than FMPOX's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMPOX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
6.40%8.26%10.51%1.17%13.25%1.31%2.00%1.86%14.92%8.99%1.37%5.23%
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
10.74%11.98%4.63%10.14%8.10%4.93%0.00%0.23%3.23%0.00%3.00%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRNKX and FMPOX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMPOX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to FRNKX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNKX dropped -97.09% vs FMPOX's -61.76%.

FMPOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNKX and FMPOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer