MVALX vs. FSMAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MVALX (Meridian Contrarian Fund) and FSMAX (Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MVALX returned 13.90%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for FSMAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVALX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSMAX.

Performance

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVALX achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MVALX has outperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 13.90%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.60% annualized return.

MVALX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 16.52%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: 30.86%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 13.90%

FSMAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 13.08%
• 1Y: 29.23%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: 12.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MVALX Meridian Contrarian Fund	16.52%	17.43%	9.73%	12.40%	-16.67%	26.66%	23.75%	23.66%	-7.85%	24.88%
FSMAX Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund	15.43%	11.40%	16.99%	25.36%	-26.44%	12.41%	32.28%	28.01%	-9.44%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MVALX and FSMAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011	0.93

The correlation between MVALX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MVALX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVALX

MVALX Risk / Return Rank: 44
MVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FSMAX

FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVALX	FSMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.71	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.39	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.29	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.97	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	10.42	-0.34

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVALX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVALX drawdown since its inception was -50.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMAX drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVALX and FSMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVALX	FSMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.65%	-50.55%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.53%	-10.26%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.80%	-26.82%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.80%	-36.31%	+11.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.06%	-50.55%	+8.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.22%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-12.13%	+5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	2.92%	+0.35%

Volatility

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) at 6.07%. This indicates that MVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVALX	FSMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.99%	6.07%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.19%	13.28%	+1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.78%	17.83%	+1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	22.43%	-1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.50%	30.28%	-8.78%

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVALX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVALX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

MVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMAX Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund	0.50%	0.57%	0.48%	1.17%	1.90%	7.49%	2.14%	4.30%	6.09%	5.44%	4.85%	6.34%
MVALX Meridian Contrarian Fund	10.99%	12.81%	4.26%	5.45%	11.45%	14.16%	4.93%	7.94%	25.52%	10.53%	0.52%	16.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVALX and FSMAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, MVALX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MVALX or FSMAX?

MVALX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to FSMAX (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVALX dropped -50.65% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.