MVAL vs. LVDS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS).

MVAL and LVDS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MVAL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 26, 2024. LVDS is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

MVAL vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MVAL vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF	-1.89%	10.10%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	1.98%	7.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 1.98% return.

MVAL

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -9.73%
• YTD: -1.89%
• 6M: 5.21%
• 1Y: 14.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LVDS

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 1.98%
• 6M: 5.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVAL vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.

MVAL

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF

LVDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF

Return for Risk

MVAL vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVAL

MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 43
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVAL vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MVAL	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.09	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MVAL	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	1.30	-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and LVDS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MVAL vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than LVDS's 8.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF	1.78%	1.75%	0.97%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	8.42%	8.25%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and LVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVAL	LVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-6.64%	-12.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.20%	-4.86%	-5.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-1.04%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MVAL	LVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	10.29%	+8.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	10.29%	+5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.58%	10.29%	+5.29%