MVAL vs. GVLU

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MVAL (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF) and GVLU (Gotham 1000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GVLU is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Gotham. MVAL is passively managed, while GVLU is actively managed. Over the past year, MVAL returned 16.12% vs 24.88% for GVLU. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GVLU.

Performance

MVAL vs. GVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than GVLU's 13.03% return.

MVAL

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 1.08%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.89%

GVLU

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 3.55%
• 6M: 8.50%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 1Y: 24.88%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF	$120.55K	$132.40K	$131.70K
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF	$7.15K	$13.83K	$24.28K

MVAL vs. GVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF	4.99%	14.17%	6.27%
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF	13.03%	11.24%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and GVLU is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024	0.82

The correlation between MVAL and GVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MVAL vs. GVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MVAL

MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 40
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 41
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 30

GVLU

GVLU Risk / Return Rank: 79
GVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
GVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MVAL vs. GVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVAL	GVLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.80	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.76	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.31	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	2.90	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	9.72	-6.97

MVAL vs. GVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the GVLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVAL and GVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. GVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum GVLU drawdown of -20.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and GVLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVAL	GVLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-20.82%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.16%	-8.14%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.90%	-1.37%	-2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-4.05%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.59%	2.43%	+3.16%

Volatility

MVAL vs. GVLU - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) at 4.01%. This indicates that MVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVAL	GVLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	4.01%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	9.44%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.92%	13.23%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	17.62%	-2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	17.62%	-2.20%

MVAL vs. GVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GVLU's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVAL vs. GVLU - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than GVLU's 5.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF	5.70%	6.44%	2.88%	1.62%	0.98%
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF	1.66%	1.75%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVAL and GVLU in my portfolio?

MVAL and GVLU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVAL or GVLU?

MVAL has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to GVLU (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVAL dropped -19.56% vs GVLU's -20.82%.

Which ETF is better, MVAL or GVLU?

On 1-year performance, GVLU leads with 24.88% vs 16.12% for MVAL. On fees, MVAL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GVLU has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVAL or GVLU?

Over the 1-year period, GVLU has performed better with a 24.88% return vs 16.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVAL or GVLU?

MVAL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GVLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVAL or GVLU?

GVLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 1.66% for MVAL.

What is the main difference between MVAL and GVLU?

MVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GVLU is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MVAL and 0.51% for GVLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.