MVAL vs. BGIG
MVAL (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. MVAL is passively managed, while BGIG is actively managed. Over the past year, MVAL returned 13.96% vs 19.51% for BGIG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.
Performance
MVAL vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than BGIG's 9.84% return.
MVAL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 13.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVAL vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | -2.29% | 14.17% | 6.10% |
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF | 9.84% | 12.49% | 7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVAL and BGIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MVAL and BGIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVAL vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank
MVAL
BGIG
MVAL vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVAL | BGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.37 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 12.97 | -10.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVAL | BGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 2.18 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.38 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
MVAL vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and BGIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVAL | BGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -13.24% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -5.81% | -6.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.57% | -0.28% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -1.70% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 1.51% | +3.37% |
Volatility
MVAL vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) at 2.57%. This indicates that MVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVAL | BGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 2.57% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 6.72% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 9.00% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 11.94% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 11.94% | +3.46% |
MVAL vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVAL vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison
MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than BGIG's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF | 1.75% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 0.78% |
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 1.79% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVAL and BGIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVAL has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to BGIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVAL dropped -19.56% vs BGIG's -13.24%.
On 1-year performance, BGIG leads with 19.51% vs 13.96% for MVAL. On fees, BGIG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BGIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BGIG has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BGIG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MVAL.
MVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.75% for BGIG.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MVAL and 0.45% for BGIG.
BGIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVAL and BGIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer