MUYY vs. XRMI

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MUYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. MUYY is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

MUYY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF (MUYY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MUYY

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 9.68%
• 3Y*: 6.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUYY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MUYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF	14.78%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MUYY and XRMI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2026	0.41

Return for Risk

MUYY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 53
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUYY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF (MUYY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUYY	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.80	—

Drawdowns

MUYY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUYY drawdown since its inception was -4.87%, smaller than the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUYY and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUYY	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-15.31%	+10.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	0.00%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-5.90%	+4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MUYY	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.23%	5.55%	+12.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	6.92%	+11.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	6.92%	+11.31%

MUYY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUYY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

MUYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.92%, more than XRMI's 12.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MUYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF	17.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.57%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUYY and XRMI in my portfolio?

MUYY and XRMI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MUYY or XRMI?

On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUYY or XRMI?

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MUYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUYY or XRMI?

MUYY has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 12.57% for XRMI.

What is the main difference between MUYY and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MUYY and 0.60% for XRMI.