PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUX vs. AG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MUX vs. AG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUX achieves a -6.59% return, which is significantly higher than AG's -9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MUX has underperformed AG with an annualized return of -9.01%, while AG has yielded a comparatively higher -1.67% annualized return.


MUX

1D
-2.26%
1M
-8.52%
6M
-28.41%
YTD
-6.59%
1Y
72.38%
3Y*
28.97%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
-9.01%
ALL TIME*
-1.01%

AG

1D
-4.21%
1M
-15.66%
6M
-27.79%
YTD
-9.68%
1Y
92.36%
3Y*
33.31%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
-1.67%
ALL TIME*
0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$178.27M$175.82M$226.19M
$13.08M$14.43M$22.88M

MUX vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
-6.59%137.92%7.91%23.04%-33.90%-10.00%-22.44%-30.01%-19.78%-21.37%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
-9.68%204.32%-10.47%-25.99%-24.73%-17.24%9.62%108.15%-12.61%-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MUX and AG is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010

0.69

The correlation between MUX and AG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (10 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MUX:

$1.03B

AG:

$7.41B

EPS

MUX:

$1.22

AG:

$0.70

PE Ratio

MUX:

14.14

AG:

21.51

PEG Ratio

MUX:

0.41

AG:

0.38

PS Ratio

MUX:

6.46

AG:

4.54

PB Ratio

MUX:

1.92

AG:

2.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

MUX:

$161.86M

AG:

$1.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MUX:

$53.23M

AG:

$863.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

MUX:

$52.58M

AG:

$1.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUX vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MUX
MUX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AG
AG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MUX vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUXAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.70

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

3.35

-0.09

MUX vs. AG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the AG Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUX and AG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUX vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUX drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, which is greater than AG's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUX and AG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUXAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.67%

-90.20%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.65%

-53.00%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.49%

-53.00%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.92%

-70.28%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.89%

-80.82%

-13.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.25%

-53.00%

-41.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.50%

-59.08%

-27.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.62%

26.79%

-5.17%

Volatility

MUX vs. AG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) is 15.38%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 18.02%. This indicates that MUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUXAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.38%

18.02%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.25%

57.35%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.72%

74.97%

-7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.37%

62.17%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.47%

61.87%

+1.60%

Dividends

MUX vs. AG - Dividend Comparison

MUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.24%0.12%0.33%0.34%0.31%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%0.55%0.44%0.34%0.47%

Financials

MUX vs. AG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McEwen Mining Inc. and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MUX and AG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AG has higher volatility (18.02%) compared to MUX (15.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUX dropped -99.67% vs AG's -90.20%.

AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUX and AG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer