MUU vs. COIG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MUU returned 5396.82% vs -78.85% for COIG. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.

Performance

MUU vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUU achieves a 798.37% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.94% return.

MUU

• 1D: -15.35%
• 1M: 121.05%
• YTD: 798.37%
• 6M: 1,279.44%
• 1Y: 5,396.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COIG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -34.67%
• YTD: -61.94%
• 6M: -74.70%
• 1Y: -78.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUU vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	798.37%	443.81%
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF	-61.94%	-9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MUU and COIG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

MUU vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

COIG

COIG Risk / Return Rank: 4
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUU vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUU	COIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	41.32	-0.57	+41.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.77	-0.63	+7.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.86	0.93	+0.93
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	104.05	-0.86	+104.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	352.22	-1.19	+353.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUU vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUU Sharpe Ratio is 41.32, which is higher than the COIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUU and COIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUU	COIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.32	-0.57	+41.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.91	-0.40	+6.31

Drawdowns

MUU vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -75.07%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and COIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUU	COIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.07%	-92.06%	+16.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.72%	-92.06%	+39.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.35%	-91.44%	+76.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.42%	-51.83%	+28.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.54%	66.13%	-50.59%

Volatility

MUU vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a higher volatility of 56.84% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) at 37.76%. This indicates that MUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUU	COIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	56.84%	37.76%	+19.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	106.70%	100.15%	+6.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.77%	138.95%	-6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	134.14%	146.21%	-12.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	134.14%	146.21%	-12.07%

MUU vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUU vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.54%	4.27%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUU and COIG in my portfolio?

MUU and COIG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUU or COIG?

MUU has higher volatility (56.84%) compared to COIG (37.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUU dropped -75.07% vs COIG's -92.06%.

Which ETF is better, MUU or COIG?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 5396.82% vs -78.85% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, COIG has been the lower-risk option at 37.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUU or COIG?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 5396.82% return vs -78.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUU or COIG?

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUU or COIG?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

What is the main difference between MUU and COIG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MUU and 0.75% for COIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (41.32 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.