MUU vs. AGZD
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
MUU vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
MUU vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and AGZD is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AGZD
MUU vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUU | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.28% | -8.46% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -0.56% | -25.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -0.77% | -9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
MUU vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 295.32% | 2.84% | +292.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 3.60% | +291.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 3.72% | +291.60% |
MUU vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and AGZD have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
AGZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
MUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while AGZD tracks Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 0.23% for AGZD.
Find the right allocation for MUU and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer