MUST vs. JMUB
MUST (Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF) and JMUB (JPMorgan Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUST is a Money Market fund tracking the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index, while JMUB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan. MUST is passively managed, while JMUB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MUST returned 0.87%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for JMUB. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUST charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JMUB.
Performance
MUST vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUST achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than JMUB's 1.26% return.
MUST
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- —
JMUB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- —
MUST vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 1.60% | 4.92% | 0.37% | 6.23% | -8.82% | 1.93% | 6.67% | 8.35% | 2.36% |
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF | 1.26% | 4.34% | 1.88% | 5.96% | -7.43% | 1.58% | 4.98% | 8.37% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUST and JMUB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between MUST and JMUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUST vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank
MUST
JMUB
MUST vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUST | JMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.56 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 3.67 | -1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.57 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.40 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 8.37 | -1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUST | JMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.56 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.37 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
MUST vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUST drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, which is greater than JMUB's maximum drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUST and JMUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUST | JMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -12.50% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | -2.55% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.08% | -4.79% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.83% | -12.06% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.59% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -2.51% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.73% | +0.37% |
Volatility
MUST vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) at 0.86%. This indicates that MUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUST | JMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 0.86% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.60% | 1.83% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.17% | 2.40% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 3.33% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 4.14% | +1.45% |
MUST vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MUST vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison
MUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than JMUB's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF | 3.60% | 3.52% | 3.50% | 3.20% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 2.13% | 3.66% | 0.45% |
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 3.32% | 3.28% | 3.13% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.62% | 2.33% | 2.70% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUST and JMUB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUST has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to JMUB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUST dropped -13.83% vs JMUB's -12.50%.
On 5-year performance, JMUB leads with 1.23% vs 0.87% for MUST. On fees, JMUB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMUB has performed better with a 1.23% return vs 0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMUB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MUST.
JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 3.32% for MUST.
MUST is categorized as Money Market, while JMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MUST and 0.18% for JMUB.
JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUST and JMUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer