PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MURMX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund (MURMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MURMX achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 3.60% return.


MURMX

1D
0.97%
1M
1.52%
YTD
9.54%
6M
8.97%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*

FRQIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MURMX
Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund
9.54%17.76%13.85%15.43%-16.20%17.37%891.67%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MURMX and FRQIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.65

The correlation between MURMX and FRQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (5 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MURMX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MURMX
MURMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MURMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MURMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MURMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MURMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MURMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund (MURMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MURMXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.75

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

11.51

+2.98

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MURMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MURMX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MURMX drawdown since its inception was -32.65%, smaller than the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MURMX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MURMXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.65%

-38.01%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-3.43%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-5.21%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.56%

-17.04%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.42%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-4.42%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.82%

+0.90%

Volatility

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund (MURMX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.78%. This indicates that MURMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MURMXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

1.78%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

3.68%

+5.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

4.35%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

5.60%

+11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

379.05%

5.34%

+373.71%

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MURMX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

MURMX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

MURMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than FRQIX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.22%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%
MURMX
Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund
8.02%8.79%8.17%2.95%11.94%4.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MURMX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MURMX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to FRQIX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MURMX dropped -32.65% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

MURMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MURMX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer