MUR vs. VT
MUR (Murphy Oil Corporation) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, MUR returned 6.26%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for VT. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MUR vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUR achieves a 27.76% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MUR has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 6.26%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.
MUR
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 27.76%
- 6M
- 21.13%
- 1Y
- 85.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
MUR vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 27.76% | 8.68% | -26.77% | 1.98% | 68.50% | 121.37% | -52.74% | 19.48% | -22.09% | 3.41% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUR and VT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008 | 0.49 |
The correlation between MUR and VT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUR vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
MUR
VT
MUR vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.42 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 3.04 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 13.53 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.31 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.69 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.74 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.44 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
MUR vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUR drawdown since its inception was -92.11%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUR and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.11% | -50.27% | -41.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.26% | -9.67% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.47% | -16.51% | -41.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.47% | -26.38% | -32.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.10% | -34.24% | -51.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.32% | -0.88% | -17.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.27% | -7.02% | -19.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.32% | 2.17% | +5.15% |
Volatility
MUR vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that MUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.96% | 3.83% | +9.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.92% | 10.17% | +24.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.46% | 12.70% | +34.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.00% | 16.05% | +29.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.38% | 17.23% | +38.15% |
Dividends
MUR vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
MUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 3.45% | 4.16% | 3.97% | 2.58% | 1.92% | 1.91% | 5.17% | 3.73% | 4.28% | 3.22% | 3.85% | 6.24% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUR and VT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUR has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUR dropped -92.11% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUR and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer