MUNI vs. PIT
MUNI (PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUNI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MUNI returned 3.78%/yr vs 18.98%/yr for PIT. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MUNI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
MUNI vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUNI achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.
MUNI
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
PIT
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- 25.62%
- 6M
- 23.58%
- 1Y
- 39.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUNI vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 1.48% | 4.72% | 1.43% | 6.07% | -0.12% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 25.62% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUNI and PIT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | -0.06 |
The correlation between MUNI and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUNI vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
MUNI
PIT
MUNI vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUNI | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.33 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.62 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 10.88 | -2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUNI vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUNI | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -15.19% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -15.19% | +12.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.09% | -15.19% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -15.19% | +14.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -4.08% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 3.66% | -2.95% |
Volatility
MUNI vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) is 0.59%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that MUNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUNI | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 4.72% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 19.40% | -17.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 21.66% | -19.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 17.50% | -14.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.85% | 17.50% | -13.65% |
MUNI vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUNI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUNI vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than PIT's 7.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 3.28% | 3.26% | 3.50% | 3.09% | 2.13% | 1.62% | 1.92% | 2.44% | 2.38% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.20% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 7.10% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUNI and PIT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MUNI (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNI dropped -11.15% vs PIT's -15.19%.
On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 18.98% vs 3.78% for MUNI. On fees, MUNI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MUNI has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 18.98% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MUNI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 3.28% for MUNI.
MUNI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MUNI and 0.55% for PIT.
MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUNI and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer