MUNI vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MUNI (PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MUNI is actively managed, while IBMM is passively managed. MUNI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.

Performance

MUNI vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MUNI

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: 2.17%

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNI vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF	0.06%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

MUNI vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNI

MUNI Risk / Return Rank: 76
MUNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MUNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MUNI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MUNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MUNI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNI vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUNI	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.33	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUNI	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	—	—

Drawdowns

MUNI vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUNI	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	0.00%	-11.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	0.00%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	0.00%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MUNI	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27%	0.00%	+2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.31%	0.00%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.85%	0.00%	+3.85%

MUNI vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUNI vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF	3.28%	3.26%	3.50%	3.09%	2.13%	1.62%	1.92%	2.44%	2.38%	2.37%	2.37%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MUNI or IBMM?

On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUNI or IBMM?

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MUNI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUNI or IBMM?

MUNI has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between MUNI and IBMM?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MUNI and 0.18% for IBMM.