PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNDX vs. GQRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MUNDX having a 3.67% return and GQRIX slightly higher at 3.79%.


MUNDX

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
3.67%
6M
4.25%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
11.73%

GQRIX

1D
-0.93%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
3.79%
6M
4.45%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MUNDX
Mundoval Fund
3.67%18.06%11.13%15.75%-18.38%22.91%14.85%21.09%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
3.79%0.91%20.18%19.79%-3.64%17.13%14.75%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNDX and GQRIX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between MUNDX and GQRIX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNDX vs. GQRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNDX
MUNDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MUNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRIX
GQRIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GQRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUNDXGQRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.09

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

0.70

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

1.78

+6.57

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the GQRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUNDX and GQRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNDX drawdown since its inception was -93.89%, which is greater than GQRIX's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNDX and GQRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNDXGQRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.89%

-28.86%

-65.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-7.00%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.89%

-16.47%

-77.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.89%

-20.29%

-73.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.32%

-7.00%

-84.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-4.90%

-9.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.75%

+0.39%

Volatility

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Volatility Comparison

Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX) at 3.06%. This indicates that MUNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNDXGQRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.06%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

7.21%

+2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

9.30%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

488.98%

14.71%

+474.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

345.81%

17.23%

+328.58%

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNDX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUNDX vs. GQRIX - Dividend Comparison

MUNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than GQRIX's 7.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.65%7.94%6.46%1.39%2.99%1.65%0.11%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUNDX
Mundoval Fund
8.33%8.63%7.29%3.10%2.88%4.56%4.85%0.52%0.24%0.19%0.50%3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUNDX and GQRIX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUNDX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to GQRIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNDX dropped -93.89% vs GQRIX's -28.86%.

MUNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNDX and GQRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer