PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUND vs. TAXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUND vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUND achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than TAXS's 0.95% return.


MUND

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXS

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUND vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUND and TAXS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUND vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MUND vs. TAXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNDTAXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

2.78

-1.79

Drawdowns

MUND vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUND drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUND and TAXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNDTAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-0.84%

-3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.07%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-0.23%

-1.65%

Volatility

MUND vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNDTAXSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

1.00%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

1.00%

+6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

1.00%

+6.29%

MUND vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MUND vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison

MUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than TAXS's 1.82% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MUND and TAXS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MUND.

MUND has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.

Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUND and 0.05% for TAXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUND and TAXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer