MUND vs. MEAR
MUND (Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
MUND vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MUND having a 1.22% return and MEAR slightly lower at 1.20%.
MUND
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEAR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
MUND vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.22% | 4.41% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.20% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUND and MEAR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUND vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
MUND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MEAR
MUND vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUND | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.74 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 24.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUND vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUND drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUND and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUND | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -2.68% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -0.08% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -0.19% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility
MUND vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUND | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.90% | 0.86% | +6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.90% | 0.99% | +5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.90% | 1.51% | +5.39% |
MUND vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MUND vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
MUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than MEAR's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.83% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 3.22% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUND and MEAR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MEAR.
MUND has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.83% for MEAR.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUND and 0.25% for MEAR.
Find the right allocation for MUND and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer