PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNC vs. ZTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNC achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than ZTAX's 4.33% return.


MUNC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZTAX

1D
2.63%
1M
3.87%
YTD
4.33%
6M
3.53%
1Y
8.62%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUNC and ZTAX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNC vs. ZTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ZTAX
ZTAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUNCZTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNC drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum ZTAX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNC and ZTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNCZTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-15.33%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-8.39%

+7.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-6.83%

+6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

Volatility

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNCZTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

32.42%

-29.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.63%

28.90%

-26.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.63%

28.90%

-26.27%

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUNC vs. ZTAX - Dividend Comparison

MUNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than ZTAX's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MUNC
Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF
2.50%1.15%0.00%0.00%
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
4.38%4.58%4.55%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUNC and ZTAX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUNC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUNC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ZTAX.

ZTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.50% for MUNC.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and X-Square. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUNC and 1.14% for ZTAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNC and ZTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer