PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNC vs. AUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNC vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNC achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than AUSM's 1.02% return.


MUNC

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUSM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNC vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUNC and AUSM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNC vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MUNC vs. AUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNCAUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

4.02

-1.78

Drawdowns

MUNC vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNC drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNC and AUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNCAUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-0.42%

-2.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

0.00%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-0.09%

-0.59%

Volatility

MUNC vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNCAUSMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

0.73%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.71%

0.73%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

0.73%

+1.98%

MUNC vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MUNC and AUSM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MUNC vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison

MUNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than AUSM's 2.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MUNC and AUSM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUNC and AUSM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

MUNC has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Allspring.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNC and AUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer