MUNC vs. TDTF
MUNC (Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and TDTF (FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MUNC is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while TDTF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS. MUNC is actively managed, while TDTF is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
MUNC vs. TDTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUNC achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than TDTF's 1.01% return.
MUNC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDTF
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
MUNC vs. TDTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 0.96% | 3.78% |
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 1.01% | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUNC and TDTF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUNC vs. TDTF — Risk / Return Rank
MUNC
TDTF
MUNC vs. TDTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUNC | TDTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.47 | +1.77 |
Drawdowns
MUNC vs. TDTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUNC drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum TDTF drawdown of -12.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNC and TDTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUNC | TDTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -12.02% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.07% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -2.91% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.47% | — |
Volatility
MUNC vs. TDTF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUNC | TDTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 3.08% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 5.69% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 5.07% | -2.36% |
MUNC vs. TDTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MUNC and TDTF have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MUNC vs. TDTF - Dividend Comparison
MUNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than TDTF's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 2.51% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.73% | 4.58% | 3.98% | 3.97% | 7.60% | 4.55% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 2.60% | 2.20% | 1.51% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUNC and TDTF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUNC and TDTF have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
TDTF has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 2.51% for MUNC.
MUNC is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TDTF is Inflation-Protected Bonds.
Find the right allocation for MUNC and TDTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer