MUNC vs. RVNU

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

MUNC (Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MUNC is actively managed, while RVNU is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUNC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.

Performance

MUNC vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNC achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.86% return.

MUNC

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RVNU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 3.86%
• 6M: 3.24%
• 1Y: 10.01%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: -0.20%
• 10Y*: 1.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNC vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF	0.96%	3.78%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.86%	5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNC and RVNU is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

MUNC vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNU

RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 70
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNC vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUNC	RVNU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.24	0.39	+1.85

Drawdowns

MUNC vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNC drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNC and RVNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUNC	RVNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-23.51%	+20.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.51%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-2.66%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-4.98%	+4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MUNC	RVNU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71%	5.10%	-2.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.71%	7.18%	-4.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.71%	7.27%	-4.56%

MUNC vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MUNC vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

MUNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than RVNU's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF	2.51%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.51%	3.46%	3.06%	2.79%	2.81%	2.18%	2.43%	2.75%	2.76%	2.49%	2.72%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUNC and RVNU in my portfolio?

MUNC and RVNU have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MUNC or RVNU?

On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUNC or RVNU?

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MUNC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUNC or RVNU?

RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.51% for MUNC.

What is the main difference between MUNC and RVNU?

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUNC and 0.15% for RVNU.