MUNC vs. IQDY
MUNC (Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and IQDY (FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MUNC is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while IQDY is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index. MUNC is actively managed, while IQDY is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUNC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IQDY.
Performance
MUNC vs. IQDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUNC achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than IQDY's 13.88% return.
MUNC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQDY
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 16.16%
- 1Y
- 35.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
MUNC vs. IQDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 0.96% | 3.78% |
IQDY FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund | 13.88% | 11.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUNC and IQDY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUNC vs. IQDY — Risk / Return Rank
MUNC
IQDY
MUNC vs. IQDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUNC | IQDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.48 | +1.76 |
Drawdowns
MUNC vs. IQDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUNC drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum IQDY drawdown of -39.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNC and IQDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUNC | IQDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -39.60% | +36.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -4.30% | +2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -9.10% | +8.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility
MUNC vs. IQDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUNC | IQDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 16.44% | -13.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 17.89% | -15.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 18.47% | -15.76% |
MUNC vs. IQDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUNC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUNC vs. IQDY - Dividend Comparison
MUNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than IQDY's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQDY FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund | 2.86% | 3.26% | 6.95% | 6.45% | 5.52% | 3.89% | 2.62% | 3.85% | 5.97% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 4.08% |
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 2.51% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUNC and IQDY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUNC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUNC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDY.
IQDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.51% for MUNC.
MUNC is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IQDY is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUNC and 0.47% for IQDY.
Find the right allocation for MUNC and IQDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer