MUNA vs. GUNR
MUNA (Northern Trust 2030 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and GUNR (FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MUNA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while GUNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. MUNA is actively managed, while GUNR is passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUNA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for GUNR.
Performance
MUNA vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUNA achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than GUNR's 14.69% return.
MUNA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUNR
- 1D
- -3.54%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 17.27%
- 1Y
- 35.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
MUNA vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MUNA Northern Trust 2030 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.59% | 0.63% |
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 14.69% | 12.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUNA and GUNR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUNA vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank
MUNA
GUNR
MUNA vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2030 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNA) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUNA | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.31 | +1.32 |
Drawdowns
MUNA vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUNA drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, smaller than the maximum GUNR drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNA and GUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUNA | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -45.64% | +44.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -6.25% | +6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -10.40% | +10.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
MUNA vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUNA | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73% | 15.58% | -13.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 19.04% | -17.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 20.44% | -18.71% |
MUNA vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUNA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUNA vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison
MUNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than GUNR's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 2.33% | 2.81% | 3.39% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.27% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% |
MUNA Northern Trust 2030 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.66% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUNA and GUNR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUNA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUNA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.
GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.66% for MUNA.
MUNA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GUNR is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUNA and 0.46% for GUNR.
Find the right allocation for MUNA and GUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer